- Cover of the appeal
- Table of Authorities
- Local Rule 28(2) Statement
- Jurisdictional Statement
- Issues Presented for Review
- Statement of the Case
- Nature of the Claim
- The Proceedings Below
- Statement of Facts
- Summary of Argument
- Argument
- Standard of Appellate Review
- Standards Applicable to a Pro Se Litigant
- RFRA Standards
Review of Imposition of a Penalty
- The Tax Court should not have dismisssed Daniel Jenkins's Claim BECAUSE HE RAISES A VIABLE THEORY UNDER THE FIRST AND NINTH AMENDMENTS FOR THE RECOGNITION AND ACCOMMODATION OF A RIGHT OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO MILITARY TAXATION
- The Tax Court Erred in Failing to Determine WHETHER ACCOMMODATING DANIEL JENKINS WOULD BE UNDULY BURDENSOME UNDER THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT OF 1993
- The Tax Court should not have Assessed a Penalty BECAUSE DANIEL JENKINS' CLAIM IS NOT FRIVOLOUS
- Conclusion